A Visionary Model for Biogas Projects

September 23, 2014 in Transportation & Fuels Author: Amanda Bilek

Biogas advocates and project developers have been abuzz since mid-July, when the Environmental Protection Agency released a final rule for the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) that allows eligible biogas transportation fuel pathways to generate cellulosic Renewable Information Numbers (RINs). Prior to the July rule, biogas transportation projects were eligible to generate advanced biofuel RINs. The cellulosic fuel pool within the RFS is much larger than the advanced biofuel pool. Statutory renewable fuel obligations by 2022 are 16 billion gallons of cellulosic biofuel and 4 billion gallons of advanced biofuel. The EPA is responsible for determining an annual renewable fuel volume obligation for the different fuel pools. Each year the EPA has significantly reduced the annual cellulosic fuel volume obligation from statutory requirements because fuel production expectations have fallen short.

Allowing biogas transportation fuel pathways to generate RFS cellulosic credits represents an amazing opportunity for biogas project development. There is an incredible amount of organic waste feedstocks that could be processed in biogas energy systems. Biogas energy systems also present an opportunity to establish perennial feedstocks. I wrote about the topic in my January column, but would like look at what this could mean for the biogas industry by looking at a proposed project with a visionary model.

Readers of Biomass Magazine might already be familiar with a project in Northern Missouri developed and constructed by Roeslein Alternative Energy (RAE). The project has an ambitious vison to produce 50 million diesel gallon equivalents by the end of the decade using biogas from hog manure and energy crops. The diesel fuel replacement goal is only one part of a grand vision. In addition to producing a large volume of low-carbon transportation fuel from cleaned and compressed biogas, the project also aims to restore 30 million acres of highly erodible land to native grasslands over the next 30 years. The grasses and other perennial species would be a feedstock input for biogas energy systems. *This post has been modified to include the video below, which describes the proposed Northern Missouri project.*

Achieving this vision will require a multi-phase plan. I recently had the opportunity to speak with Rudi Roeslein, CEO of Roeslein Alternative Energy, about their planned approach. The first phase of the project is already underway. RAE and their project partner, Murphy-Brown of Missouri, announced the commencement of the installation of impermeable covers on 88 existing hog manure lagoons.  The next phase of the project will implement biogas cleaning and conditioning equipment to produce a source of renewable natural gas (RNG) and establish a network of distribution centers to provide RNG to vehicle fleets. The third phase will establish a demonstration project using above ground anaerobic digestion systems to process hog manure and perennial feedstocks.

Murphy Brown in cooperation with the Missouri Prairie Foundation, the Missouri Department of Conservation, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Natural Resources Conservation Serviceplanted 400 acres in prairie plantings that could now be used as part of the testing program.  In addition, Roeslein Northern Missouri Real Estate has been replanting and restoring native grassland and prairie on their 1650 acre farm located within the project area for the past 5 years and has adequate feedstock to test in the demonstration project. The University of Minnesota has been engaged by Roeslein Alternative Energy in the testing of various feedstock to evaluate the potential methane yield and help evaluate ecological services such feedstock would provide.

The Roeslein project vision and all of the potential economic and environmental benefits is exciting and inspiring. This type of model could be replicated throughout the Midwest, the US and even globally.  This project can significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions by capturing methane from hog manure, sequestrating carbon in perennial grasslands, and displacing diesel fuel with RNG. The project will also result in improved water quality and establish habitat for wildlife. There are also economic benefits in the form of job creation, local economic activity for construction and operations, and increased farm income from energy crop purchases.

The EPA’s recent action expanding biogas transportation fuel pathways to generate cellulosic RINs represents an enormous opportunity for project scale-up all across the US. Biogas proponents should feel inspired by the Roeslein Alternative Energy project model in Northern Missouri.

2014 will be the year that we see commercial scale production of cellulosic ethanol using corn stover as a feedstock. These first-of-a-kind liquid renewable fuel projects need an enormous amount of feedstock to begin operation. Biogas energy projects could play a role in helping to establish energy crops for future projects. Biogas energy projects do not require as much feedstock volume as liquid renewable fuel projects, but could immediately provide a market for producers willing to establish grassland and native perennials on a portion of their land.  So many different opportunities are possible for the biogas industry; we just need to reach out and grab them.

*This post first appeared in Biomass Magazine.*

Renewable Fuel Standard rules give boost to biogas

August 9, 2014 in Transportation & Fuels Author: Amanda Bilek
In early July, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final rule for the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) program that expands pathways for biogas-based fuel to help meet numeric goals for cellulosic and advanced fuel. The final renewable fuel pathway and modification rule is anticipated to provide a significant boost for biogas projects designed to supply a source of renewable and low-carbon transportation fuel.

Continue reading »

Letter to MISO regarding lowering their minimum megawatt limit to encourage participation of distributed resources

July 18, 2014 in News & Press Author: Steve Dahlke

July 18, 2014 Dear Mike Robinson and Ted Kuhn, The following are comments from the MISO Environmental Sector regarding MISO’s minimum capacity resource limits. Specifically, we ask that MISO re-assess its current minimum limit of 5 MW and look at implementing a limit comparable to PJM (100 kW). This issue was raised by market participants at the June 4, 2014 Demand Response Working Group as a barrier to demand response participation in MISO’s markets. MISO responded with an informational presentation at the July 7 DRWG, describing its rules regarding minimum capacity resource limits, and requested additional stakeholder feedback on the topic. Continue reading »

International cooperation yields exchange of project models

June 3, 2014 in Transportation & Fuels Author: Amanda Bilek

In today’s global marketplace, even before the first good or service is produced for export, a significant amount of relationship building and information sharing among trading partners occurs. Formulating relationships and defining cooperation agreements are the first step on the path to global trade. This applies to several industries, but international cooperation is a critical element for the bioenergy sector.  Continue reading »

Sweden and Minnesota Move Forward on Bioenergy Cooperation

May 29, 2014 in Transportation & Fuels Author: Amanda Bilek

Industry and ProjectsSweden currently landfills less than 1 percent of their total solid waste. That is not a typo and yes, you did read that statistic right! Using a combination of recycling, energy recovery and biological treatment Sweden is able to successfully manage over 99 percent of their waste resources for productive use. This impressive statistic and others were revealed at a recent seminar on Sustainable Transportation held at the American Swedish Institute in Minneapolis.  Continue reading »

Landmark climate report presents the Midwest with both challenge and opportunity

May 8, 2014 in Reports & Whitepapers Author: Rolf Nordstrom

Rolf Nordstrom, GPI’s President and CEO, is a co-author of the Midwest chapter of the third National Climate Assessment.

This week the federal government released the third National Climate Assessment (NCA), a comprehensive report on climate change impacts in the US.  Initiated under George H.W. Bush and mandated by Congress in 1990 to inform policymakers and the public, the first NCA was published in 2000.

The NCA contributes to a shared understanding of climate science and provides guidance in crafting policy to prevent – and respond to the effects of – climate change.

It’s worth noting that this report is produced by more than 300 scientists and other experts from academia, government, industry, and NGOs, guided by a Federal Advisory Committee, while also incorporating extensive feedback from the public.

Unique look at on-the-ground impacts of climate change in specific regions of the US

While there have been other reports released on climate change in recent months, this report is set apart by its focus on concrete impacts to each region of the US.

As John Podesta, Counselor to President Obama, commented this week,

“This third National Climate Assessment will be the most authoritative and comprehensive source of scientific information ever produced about how climate change is going to impact all regions of the United States and key sectors of the national economy.”

Report is unequivocal about the immediate – and long-term – effects of climate change

This new scientific report on climate change is unequivocal – the effects are already being felt today by people across the country and we are paying a heavy price.  The NCA asserts in the introduction that, “Climate change, once considered an issue for a distant future, has moved firmly into the present.”

[NCA GRAPHIC:  Percent changes in the amount of precipitation falling in very heavy events (the heaviest 1%) from 1958 to 2012 for each region. There is a clear national trend toward a greater amount of precipitation being concentrated in very heavy events, particularly in the Northeast and Midwest. (Figure source: updated from Karl et al. 2009)]

 

For many of us, this comes as no surprise. As a fifth-generation Iowa farmer recently observed, “we don’t know what normal is anymore.”  The NCA clearly shows that the effects of climate change are already impacting our communities in tangible ways, from increased heat waves, droughts and floods to more invasive species and declining water quality.

Below, a graphic from the report illustrates the projected changes to our climate in the Midwest and the associated impacts to human health, electricity demand, weather and agriculture.

Report highlights the critical role of the Midwest in achieving a transition to a zero or low-carbon energy economy

The NCA illustrates the huge opportunity in the Midwest to tackle this challenge and lead the nation – and world – in deploying renewable and low-carbon energy resources, including wind, solar, and biomass resources; and capturing, storing, and putting to productive use carbon dioxide from fossil energy production.

Here are just a few of the ways that we at GPI are working to make this transition a reality, from actions in our own community to national – and even international – collaborations.

While the NCA shows the major challenges we face from climate change, it also provides us with the shared knowledge to chart a path forward and develop real, sustainable solutions.

Click here to view the NCA website.

Click here to view the NCA’s Midwest chapter and here for a 2-page summary of the chapter.

Rolf Nordstrom, GPI’s President and CEO, is a co-author of the Midwest chapter of the third National Climate Assessment